Skip to content
Study Hall
Lesson 7 of 8Canada, 1945–1982
Unit 4 · Lesson 7 of 8

Immigration, Refugees and Multiculturalism, 1945–1982

How Canadian immigration policy moved from openly favouring white Europeans to the non-racial points system of 1967, which groups of displaced persons and refugees Canada accepted (and on what terms), why Canada adopted a policy of multiculturalism in 1971, and how the Immigration Act of 1976 and the Southeast Asian refugee movement of 1979–80 reshaped Canada's population, cities and identity.

6 min read8 practice questionsAsk AI about this →

Key things to remember

  1. 1Canada admitted more than 165,000 displaced persons after the Second World War; the Canadian Citizenship Act took effect on January 1, 1947.
  2. 2The Chinese Immigration Act was repealed on May 14, 1947, but racial preferences remained in policy until the 1962 regulations and the 1967 points system.
  3. 3The 1967 points system judged applicants on education, skills, language, age and job offers rather than race or nationality.
  4. 4Prime Minister Trudeau announced the policy of multiculturalism within a bilingual framework on October 8, 1971.
  5. 5The Immigration Act of 1976 (in force 1978) made refugees a separate class and allowed private sponsorship; about 60,000 Southeast Asian refugees came in 1979–80.

In 1946 almost everyone arriving at Halifax's Pier 21 came from Britain or the rest of Europe, and Canada's laws made sure of it: Chinese immigration had been all but banned since 1923, and officials could turn people away for their nationality or "race". By 1982, a family arriving at Toronto's airport was as likely to come from Hong Kong, India, Jamaica, the Philippines or Vietnam as from Europe, and Canada officially described itself as multicultural. How did policy change so dramatically, and what did these changes mean for heritage and identity in Canada?

After the war: open doors for some

After 1945 Canada needed workers for its booming economy. Tens of thousands of war brides arrived with their children, and Canada admitted more than 165,000 displaced persons (DPs), people uprooted by the war, including Ukrainians, Poles, Balts and Jewish Holocaust survivors, between 1947 and the early 1950s, often on contracts to work in mines, forests, farms or as domestic workers. Large numbers of Dutch, Italian, Greek and Portuguese immigrants followed in the 1950s and 60s, building neighbourhoods such as Toronto's Little Italy. But on May 1, 1947, Prime Minister Mackenzie King told Parliament that Canada would welcome immigrants to grow its population but did not intend to change the "fundamental composition" of its people, meaning policy would continue to favour white Europeans. The Immigration Act of 1952 kept broad powers to refuse people on grounds such as nationality and ethnic group.

Law or policyRefugees welcomed194519501955196019651970197519801947The ChineseImmigration Act(the “ExclusionAct”) is repealed1962New rules end mostracialdiscrimination inchoosingimmigrants1971Officialmulticulturalismpolicy:“multiculturalismwithin a bilingualframework”1976 (in force1978)Immigration Act:refugee protectionwritten into law;privatesponsorshippossible1956–1957About 37,000Hungarian refugeesarrive after thefailed uprisingagainst Sovietrule1967Points system:applicants judgedon education,skills andlanguage, not raceor nationality1972About 7,000Ugandan Asians,expelled by IdiAmin, are accepted1979–198060,000 SoutheastAsian refugees(“boat people”),more than halfprivatelysponsored
Fig 1Immigration and refugees, 1945–1982: repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act (1947), Hungarian refugees (1956–57), the points system (1967), the official multiculturalism policy (1971), Ugandan Asian refugees (1972), the Immigration Act of 1976 (in force 1978) and the Vietnamese and Southeast Asian "boat people" (1979–80).
ChangeDateWhat it meant
Canadian Citizenship ActIn force January 1, 1947For the first time, people were Canadian citizens and not only British subjects living in Canada
Repeal of the Chinese Immigration ActMay 14, 1947Ended the 1923 ban, but Chinese immigration was still limited mostly to close family members for years; Chinese and South Asian Canadians won the federal vote in 1947
Quotas for South Asia1951Small yearly quotas for immigrants from India, Pakistan and Ceylon (now Sri Lanka): a door barely opened
Caribbean Domestic SchemeFrom 1955Women from Jamaica, Barbados and later other Caribbean countries were admitted as landed immigrants on condition that they work as live-in domestic workers for at least a year, after which they could change jobs; the yearly numbers admitted were small
New regulations1962Removed most openly racial criteria and made education and skills the main test, though family sponsorship rules still favoured Europeans
The points system1967Applicants scored points for education, job skills, knowledge of English or French, age and a job offer, regardless of race or nationality
Immigration ActPassed 1976; in force 1978Set goals of family reunion, non-discrimination and humanitarian help; created refugees as a separate class and allowed private groups to sponsor refugees
Turning points in immigration policy, 1947–1978.

Refugees

  • Hungarians (1956–57): after the Soviet Union crushed the Hungarian uprising, Canada quickly admitted about 37,000 refugees, waiving many usual requirements. The fact that they were European and fleeing communism during the Cold War made them popular with the public and the government.
  • Czechoslovaks (1968–69): after Soviet tanks ended the Prague Spring, about 11,000–12,000 Czech and Slovak refugees came.
  • Tibetans (1970–71): a small group of about 230 Tibetan refugees was resettled in communities across Canada.
  • Ugandan Asians (1972): when dictator Idi Amin expelled Uganda's South Asian population in August 1972, Canada accepted about 6,000–7,000 people within months, many of them Ismaili Muslims who built new lives across Canada.
  • Chileans (from 1973): after a military coup, several thousand Chileans fled to Canada, though only after church and labour groups pressed a government that had been more willing to take refugees from communist countries.
  • The "boat people" (1979–80): after the Vietnam War, hundreds of thousands fled Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, many in crowded boats. Canada set a target of 50,000 and then raised it to 60,000; more than half were privately sponsored by churches, community groups and families under the new 1976 Act. In 1986 the United Nations awarded the Nansen Refugee Award to the people of Canada.
Historical perspective: why some refugees and not others?
Compare Canada's quick welcome for Hungarians in 1956 with its refusal of Jewish refugees in the 1930s (see Unit 3) and its slower response to Chileans in 1973. Cold War politics, racism, economic needs and public opinion all shaped who was welcomed. Asking why a government helped one group faster than another is a good way to uncover the values of the time.

Multiculturalism (1971)

The Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism (1963–1969) described Canada as a partnership of two founding peoples, English and French. Ukrainian Canadians and other groups, sometimes called the "third force", objected that this ignored the millions of Canadians of other backgrounds, and First Nations, Métis and Inuit rejected being left out of the "founding peoples" altogether. On October 8, 1971, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau announced a policy of multiculturalism within a bilingual framework: Canada would have two official languages but no official culture, and the government would help cultural groups keep their heritage and take part fully in Canadian life. Canada was the first country to adopt multiculturalism as an official policy. The policy was later written into section 27 of the Charter (1982) and the Canadian Multiculturalism Act (1988).

ASupporters of multiculturalism said
  • It recognized the reality of a diverse Canada
  • People did not have to give up their heritage to be Canadian
  • It encouraged immigrants to feel welcome and take part
  • Festivals, languages and community groups enriched Canada
BCritics said
  • Many Québécois saw it as downgrading French Canada to one culture among many
  • Some argued it divided Canadians instead of building a shared identity
  • Others said it funded festivals but did little against racism and inequality
  • Indigenous leaders said First Nations, Métis and Inuit are nations, not one ethnic group among many

A changing population and new heritage

Because the points system ignored race and nationality, the sources of immigration changed quickly. By the late 1970s, a large and growing share of newcomers came from Asia, the Caribbean, Latin America and Africa. Cities changed most: Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver gained new neighbourhoods, places of worship, restaurants, media and festivals. Caribana (now the Toronto Caribbean Carnival) began in 1967 as a Centennial project of Toronto's Caribbean community, Winnipeg's Folklorama began in 1970, and multilingual radio such as Toronto's CHIN served many language communities. Change also brought loss and conflict: Toronto's first Chinatown was largely demolished in the 1950s and 60s to build the new City Hall and its square, and many newcomers faced racism in housing and jobs.

Significance check
When you assess the points system, use more than one criterion: it changed policy (race was removed as a test), it had deep consequences (the population became far more diverse), and it continues to shape Canada (a points-based approach is still used today). That makes it one of the most significant policies of the period.

Worked examples

Reveal one step at a time and try to beat it to the next line.

Example 1
A simplified points test (for practice only) awards up to 20 points for education, 10 for language, 10 for age, 10 for a job offer and 50 for skills and other factors, out of 100, with a pass mark of 50. An applicant scores 16 for education, 8 for language, 10 for age, 0 for a job offer and 20 for skills. Do they pass, and why was this kind of system a historic change?
Example 2
Explain why Canada adopted a policy of multiculturalism in 1971.
Example 3
Compare Canada's responses to Hungarian refugees (1956) and Chilean refugees (1973). What explains the difference?

Where marks get lost

  • Thinking the 1947 repeal of the Chinese Immigration Act ended discrimination. Chinese immigration remained heavily restricted until the 1962 and 1967 reforms.
  • Saying multiculturalism replaced bilingualism. The 1971 policy was multiculturalism within a bilingual framework: two official languages, no official culture.
  • Assuming refugee policy was always generous. Canada's responses depended on Cold War politics, the refugees' origins and public pressure.
  • Confusing the points system (1967) with the Immigration Act (1976). The points system changed how immigrants were selected; the 1976 Act set new goals and created refugee and private sponsorship categories.

Flashcards 8

Displaced persons
Canadian Citizenship Act
Points system
Multiculturalism within a bilingual framework
+ 4 more

Practice

1
Put these immigration and refugee events in chronological order.
  1. 1Canada accepts Asians expelled from Uganda
  2. 2Trudeau announces the multiculturalism policy
  3. 3Canada admits Southeast Asian boat people under a target of 60,000
  4. 4The Chinese Immigration Act is repealed
  5. 5Canada admits refugees from the Hungarian uprising
  6. 6The points system is introduced
2
What was historically new about the 1967 points system?
3
Using a simplified practice points test with a pass mark of 50 out of 100, an applicant scores 14 for education, 6 for language, 8 for age, 10 for a job offer and 15 for skills. What is their total score?
points
4
Match each refugee group to the event that caused them to flee.
Hungarians (1956–57)
Czechoslovaks (1968–69)
Ugandan Asians (1972)
Southeast Asian boat people (1979–80)
5
Why did some Québécois criticize the 1971 multiculturalism policy?
6
What 1976 law, in force in 1978, made refugees a separate class and allowed private groups to sponsor them? (Name the act.)
7
What did Mackenzie King's statement of May 1, 1947, signal about immigration?
8
Which statement about the Southeast Asian refugee movement of 1979–80 is accurate?

Spot a mistake on this page? Let us know