Skip to content
Study Hall
Lesson 5 of 8Climate Change
Unit 3 · Lesson 5 of 8

Evidence of Past and Present Climate Change

How ice cores, tree rings, lake sediments and fossils record past climates, the natural factors that changed climate before people, the modern indicators of warming, and how to test a cause-and-effect hypothesis with time-trend data.

6 min read10 practice questionsAsk AI about this →

Key things to remember

  1. 1Proxies (ice cores, tree rings, lake and ocean sediments, fossils) record past climate; ice-core bubbles preserve samples of ancient air.
  2. 2Natural factors: plate tectonics, uplift and weathering, orbital cycles, solar output and volcanoes; each acts on its own time scale.
  3. 3Long-term global warming is about 1.3–1.4 °C above pre-industrial (1850–1900); Canada has warmed about 1.7 times as fast since 1948 (almost twice as fast since 1970), and the North more than twice as fast.
  4. 4Indicators: rising temperature and sea level, shrinking Arctic sea ice and glaciers, changing weather extremes, rising CO₂ in the carbon budget.
  5. 5Correlation is not causation: a causal claim also needs a mechanism and the ruling out of other explanations.

About 20,000 years ago, the spot where Toronto stands was buried under more than a kilometre of ice. Nobody was there with a thermometer, so how do scientists know? Nature keeps its own records. Ice, trees, lake mud and fossils lock in clues about the conditions when they formed. These natural records, called proxies, let us reconstruct climates long before weather stations, and compare today's changes with the past.

Reading past climates from proxies

Ice coresone layer per year;trapped air bubbles→ past CO₂; isotopesin the ice → pasttemperatureTree ringsone ring per year;wide ring: warm, wet,good growing year;narrow ring: cold ordry yearSediment layerslake and ocean floorlayers build up; pollen→ which plants grew;shells → past watertemperatureFossilseach species needsa certain climate:e.g. palm fossils inthe Arctic → it wasonce much warmernewerolderwater
Fig 1How proxies record climate: an ice core with layers and trapped air bubbles (past CO₂) and isotopes (past temperature), tree rings that are wide in good growing years, lake and ocean sediment layers holding pollen and shells, and fossils of species that need a particular climate, such as palm fossils found in the Arctic.
ProxyWhat scientists measureWhat it revealsHow far back
Ice coresAir bubbles trapped in the ice; the ratio of heavy to light isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen in the ice; dust and volcanic ash layersPast CO₂ and methane levels (directly, from the bubbles); past temperature (from isotopes); past eruptions and dustinessAbout 800,000 years in published Antarctic records; a core finished in 2025 reaches more than 1.2 million years
Tree ringsWidth and density of each annual growth ringWide rings mean good growing years (warm and moist enough); narrow rings mean drought or cold. Counting and matching rings dates each yearHundreds of years from one tree; over 10,000 years by matching overlapping trees
Lake sediment coresAnnual layers (varves); pollen grains; charcoal; remains of tiny organismsWhich plants grew nearby (and so the climate); past fires; how fast sediment built upThousands to tens of thousands of years
Ocean sediment coresShells of tiny plankton and their chemistryPast ocean temperatures and global ice volumeMillions of years
Fossils and preserved organismsThe kinds of plants and animals found in rock, peat or permafrostTropical corals or warm-climate plants in rock that is now cold suggest a warmer past climate there (allowing for continents moving)Hundreds of millions of years
The main climate proxies. Scientists combine several, because each one has limits and they check each other.
Canadian scientists: Alice Wilson and W. Richard Peltier
Alice Wilson was Canada's first woman geologist and worked for the Geological Survey of Canada from 1909 to 1946. She spent decades mapping the rocks of the Ottawa Valley and studying their Ordovician fossils, about 450 million years old: corals, brachiopods and other sea creatures showing that eastern Ontario was once covered by a warm, shallow sea. William Richard Peltier, a physicist at the University of Toronto, built computer models of how the great ice sheets of the last ice age pressed down the land and changed sea level. His models explain why the land around Hudson Bay is still rising today, thousands of years after the ice melted, and they help separate that slow rebound from modern sea-level rise.

Natural factors that change climate

Natural factorHow it changes climateTime scale
Plate tectonicsMoving continents change where land sits relative to the poles and rearrange ocean currentsTens to hundreds of millions of years
Mountain uplift and weatheringNewly exposed rock reacts with CO₂ in rain as it weathers, slowly drawing CO₂ out of the airMillions of years
Orbital (Milankovitch) cyclesChanges in the shape of Earth's orbit, the tilt of its axis and the wobble of the axis shift how sunlight is spread across seasons and latitudes; these pace the ice agesTens of thousands to about 100,000 years
Solar outputThe Sun's brightness changes slightly, for example over the 11-year sunspot cycleYears to centuries
Volcanic eruptionsLarge eruptions put sulfur particles high in the atmosphere that reflect sunlight and cool Earth briefly; volcanoes also release some CO₂Cooling for 1–3 years after a big eruption
Natural causes of climate change. The present warming is far faster than orbital or tectonic changes, and it is not explained by the Sun or volcanoes.

Indicators of present-day change

  • Global temperature: long-term warming is now estimated at about 1.3–1.4 °C above the 1850–1900 average. The World Meteorological Organization reported that 2024 was the warmest year on record, about 1.55 °C above that baseline and the first calendar year above 1.5 °C. One year above 1.5 °C is not the same as crossing the Paris Agreement's 1.5 °C goal, which refers to warming averaged over about 20 years.
  • Canada: Canada warmed about 2.0 °C from 1948 to 2023, about 65% faster than the global average over that period and almost twice as fast since 1970; northern Canada warmed about 2.6 °C, more than twice the global rate (Canada's Changing Climate Report, 2026).
  • Sea level: global sea level has risen about 10 cm since satellite measurements began in 1993, and the yearly rate has more than doubled over that period, from melting glaciers and ice sheets and the expansion of warming seawater.
  • Glacial and polar ice: Arctic sea ice at its late-summer minimum has shrunk by roughly 12% per decade since satellite records began in 1979; mountain glaciers such as the Athabasca Glacier in the Rockies are retreating; the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are losing ice.
  • Wind and weather patterns: storm tracks and the jet stream respond to warming, and heavy rainfall and extreme heat are becoming more frequent in many regions.
  • The global carbon budget: careful accounting of how much carbon is emitted and where it goes shows atmospheric CO₂ rising by about 2 to almost 4 ppm per year in recent years (a record jump of about 3.75 ppm at Mauna Loa in 2024), and chemical fingerprints in that CO₂ show the extra carbon comes from fossil fuels.

Testing a cause-and-effect hypothesis with time-trend data

Hypothesis: "Rising CO₂ since the Industrial Revolution is causing global temperatures to rise." You cannot run a controlled experiment on a whole planet, so scientists use time-trend data: records of each variable through time. The table shows rounded decade averages.

DecadeAverage CO₂ (ppm)Temperature above 1850–1900 average (°C)
1960sabout 320about 0.2
1980sabout 345about 0.5
2000sabout 380about 0.9
2010sabout 400about 1.1
Approximate decade averages of atmospheric CO₂ (Mauna Loa) and global surface temperature. Values are rounded.

Both variables rise together: they are positively correlated. But a correlation alone does not prove that one causes the other; ice cream sales and drownings both rise in summer because of a third factor, hot weather. To support causation, scientists need a mechanism (CO₂ absorbs infrared, which has been measured in labs since the 1850s), and they must rule out other explanations. The Sun's output has not increased since the 1950s and has dipped slightly since the 1980s, while temperatures climbed. Volcanoes cause brief cooling, not decades of warming. And the pattern of change fits greenhouse warming, not a brighter Sun: the lower atmosphere is warming while the stratosphere above it is cooling, and nights have generally warmed faster than days. Many independent lines of evidence point to the same cause, which is why the IPCC concludes that human influence is the dominant cause of the warming since the mid-20th century.

Careers: geochemist and climatologist
A geochemist studies the chemistry of rocks, water, ice and air. Geochemists measure the gases in ice-core bubbles and the isotopes in ice and shells that turn proxies into numbers. Climatologists then combine these records with modern measurements and computer models to test explanations for climate change.

Worked examples

Reveal one step at a time and try to beat it to the next line.

Example 1
A tree-ring core from an old white pine in northern Ontario shows rings formed from 1880 to 2024. The rings from 1930 to 1937 are unusually narrow. What can you infer, and how would you check it?
Example 2
Use the decade table in this lesson. Calculate the average rate of CO₂ increase between the 1960s and the 2010s, and between the 1980s and the 2010s, in ppm per year. What does the comparison show?
Example 3
Evaluate the claim: "In ice cores, temperature sometimes started rising before CO₂, so CO₂ cannot cause warming."

Where marks get lost

  • Treating correlation as proof of causation. Two trends rising together is a starting point; you also need a mechanism and to rule out other causes.
  • Saying "the climate has always changed, so this change is natural." Past changes had causes too; today's natural factors (Sun, orbit, volcanoes) do not explain the current rapid warming, and greenhouse gases do.
  • Thinking one record-breaking year means the Paris 1.5 °C limit has been passed. The Paris goal refers to long-term warming averaged over about 20 years, not a single year.
  • Reading a narrow tree ring as "cold" every time. Narrow rings mean poor growth, which can come from drought, cold, insects or damage; check other records.
  • Assuming the outermost tree ring or the top of an ice core is the oldest. In both, the newest layer is on the outside or on top, and age increases inward or downward.

Flashcards 8

Proxy (climate)
Ice core
Dendrochronology
Varves
+ 4 more

Practice

1
Match each proxy to what it mainly reveals about past climate.
Air bubbles in an ice core
Tree-ring widths
Pollen in lake sediments
Fossil corals in Ontario rock
2
Which proxy gives the most direct measurement of carbon dioxide levels hundreds of thousands of years ago?
3
If global sea level rose at an average rate of 3.3 mm per year for 30 years, how much would it rise in total, in millimetres?
mm
4
Global temperature was about 0.5 °C above the 1850–1900 average in the 1980s and about 1.1 °C above it in the 2010s. What was the average rate of warming in °C per decade over those 30 years, to one decimal place?
°C per decade
5
A study finds that towns with more cellphone towers have more births per year. Which conclusion is best?
6
Which observation helps rule out the Sun as the main cause of recent warming?
7
Which natural factor paces the cycle of ice ages over tens of thousands of years?
8
Put the steps for testing a cause-and-effect hypothesis with time-trend data in order.
  1. 1Draw and communicate a conclusion with its limitations
  2. 2Check for a physical mechanism and rule out other causes
  3. 3Graph the data and look for a correlation
  4. 4State a hypothesis linking a cause to an effect
  5. 5Collect long-term records of both variables
9
What is the scientific name for dating events and studying past climates using tree rings?
10
The WMO reported that 2024 was about 1.55 °C above the pre-industrial average. Which statement is accurate?

Spot a mistake on this page? Let us know