Skip to content
Study Hall
Lesson 3 of 8The Nature of Matter
Unit 3 · Lesson 3 of 8

How Models of the Atom Developed

How Dalton, Thomson, Rutherford, Bohr and Chadwick each used experimental evidence to improve the model of the atom, and how the modern electron cloud model builds on their work.

6 min read8 practice questionsAsk AI about this →

Key things to remember

  1. 1Dalton (1803): atoms are tiny, solid, indivisible spheres; atoms of each element are identical.
  2. 2Thomson (1897): discovered the electron using cathode rays; plum pudding model.
  3. 3Rutherford (1911): gold foil experiment showed the atom is mostly empty space with a tiny, dense, positive nucleus.
  4. 4Bohr (1913): electrons occupy fixed energy levels (shells); explains line spectra.
  5. 5Chadwick (1932): discovered the neutral neutron in the nucleus.
  6. 6Modern quantum model: electrons are found in electron clouds (regions of probability) around the nucleus.

Atoms are so small that millions of them lined up side by side would just span the dot at the end of this sentence. No one could see one for most of history, so how do we know what they look like inside? Scientists built models: simplified pictures or descriptions that explain what we observe. Each time a new experiment produced a result the old model could not explain, the model was changed. The story of the atom is one of the best examples of how science works: ideas are tested, and evidence wins.

The idea of atoms is old. Around 400 BCE the Greek thinker Democritus argued that if you kept cutting matter in half, you would eventually reach a piece that could not be cut. He called it atomos, meaning uncuttable. But he had no experiments to test the idea, and it was mostly set aside for about 2000 years.

1803Daltonsolid sphereEvidenceElements combinein fixed ratiosby mass, so matteris made of tinysolid atoms1897Thomsonplum puddingEvidenceCathode rays aretiny negativeparticles insideatoms: electrons1911Rutherfordnuclear modelEvidenceGold foil: mostalpha particlespassed through;a few bouncedback. Atoms aremostly empty witha tiny + nucleus1913Bohrenergy levelsEvidenceEach element givesoff only certaincolours of light(line spectra), soelectrons havefixed energy levels1932Chadwickadds the neutronEvidenceFound a neutralparticle in thenucleus: theneutron. It addsmass but no chargeproton (+)neutron (no charge)electron (−)
Fig 1A timeline of atomic models: Dalton's solid sphere (1803), Thomson's plum pudding with electrons (1897), Rutherford's nucleus from the gold foil experiment (1911), Bohr's orbits or energy levels (1913) and Chadwick's neutron (1932), each with a small drawing and the key evidence below it.
Scientist and yearModelKey evidence or idea
John Dalton, 1803Solid sphere (billiard ball): atoms are tiny, solid and indivisibleElements always combine in fixed mass ratios to form compounds
J. J. Thomson, 1897Plum pudding: electrons scattered through a ball of positive chargeCathode rays are streams of tiny negative particles, the electrons
Ernest Rutherford, 1911Nuclear model: a tiny, dense, positive nucleus with electrons around it; mostly empty spaceGold foil experiment by Geiger and Marsden (1909)
Niels Bohr, 1913Electrons travel in fixed orbits called energy levels or shellsEach element gives off only certain colours of light (a line spectrum)
James Chadwick, 1932The nucleus contains neutral neutrons as well as protonsA neutral radiation that knocked protons out of wax
The main steps in the development of the atomic model.

Dalton's model (1803). Chemists had discovered that elements always combine in the same mass ratios: water always contains 8 g of oxygen for every 1 g of hydrogen. The English chemist John Dalton explained this with an atomic theory, first presented in 1803 and published in full in 1808: all matter is made of tiny, indivisible atoms; atoms of one element are identical; atoms of different elements differ in mass; and compounds form when atoms join in simple whole-number ratios. His picture of an atom was a solid ball, like a tiny billiard ball.

Thomson's model (1897). J. J. Thomson studied cathode rays, glowing beams inside a glass tube with most of the air removed. The rays bent toward a positively charged plate, so they had to be made of negative particles. They were the same no matter which metal he used, and each particle was far lighter than the lightest atom (today we know an electron has about 1/1836 the mass of a hydrogen atom). These particles, the electrons, had to be parts of all atoms, so atoms were not indivisible after all. Since atoms are neutral overall, Thomson went on to picture (by 1904) electrons stuck in a ball of positive charge, like raisins in a bun or plums in a pudding.

The gold foil experiment

In 1909, working in Ernest Rutherford's lab in Manchester, Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden fired fast, positively charged alpha particles from a radioactive source at a very thin sheet of gold foil. A screen around the foil flashed wherever an alpha particle hit. If Thomson's model were right, the spread-out positive charge would be too weak to turn the heavy, fast alpha particles, and they should all pass almost straight through. Most did. But a very few, roughly 1 in 8000, bounced off at large angles, some straight back. Rutherford said it was as if you fired a large artillery shell at tissue paper and it came back and hit you. In 1911 he published his explanation.

AWhat they observed
  • Most alpha particles passed straight through the foil.
  • Some were deflected (turned) slightly.
  • A very few bounced back toward the source.
BWhat Rutherford concluded
  • An atom is mostly empty space.
  • The positive charge is concentrated in a tiny region that repels positive alpha particles passing close to it.
  • Almost all the atom's mass is packed into that tiny, dense, positive centre: the nucleus.
A Canadian connection
Before Manchester, Rutherford worked at McGill University in Montreal from 1898 to 1907. His research on radioactivity there earned him the 1908 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. One of his early research students at McGill was Harriet Brooks, born in Exeter, Ontario, and Canada's first woman nuclear physicist. Her measurements helped show that the radioactive emanation given off by thorium was a new heavy gas, which we now know as a form of radon. Rutherford later identified the positive particle in the nucleus and named it the proton (1920).

Bohr's model (1913). Rutherford's model had a problem: why don't the negative electrons spiral into the positive nucleus? And when an element such as hydrogen is heated, it gives off only certain colours of light, seen as separate bright lines (a line spectrum) rather than a full rainbow. The Danish physicist Niels Bohr explained both. In his model, electrons can only travel in certain fixed orbits, called energy levels or shells. An electron can jump up to a higher shell when it absorbs energy, and it gives off light of one exact colour when it drops back down. Because the shells have fixed energies, only certain colours appear.

Bohr Model — Argon, 2-8-818 p⁺22 n⁰2e⁻8e⁻8e⁻photon emitted (hν)line emission spectrumeach line = a photon energy = a specific electron drop
Fig 2A Bohr model of argon: a nucleus with 18 protons and 22 neutrons, electrons in shells of 2, 8 and 8, and one electron dropping from the third shell to the second and giving off a photon of light. Each kind of drop produces one bright line in the element's line spectrum.

Chadwick's neutron (1932). Helium has 2 protons but about 4 times the mass of hydrogen, which has 1 proton. Something else in the nucleus had to carry mass. The English physicist James Chadwick, a former student of Rutherford, bombarded beryllium with alpha particles and found a radiation that was not bent by electric or magnetic fields, so it had no charge, yet it could knock protons out of paraffin wax, so its particles had about the same mass as a proton. He called them neutrons.

The modern model
In the 1920s, scientists including Erwin Schrödinger developed the quantum mechanical model. It keeps the nucleus of protons and neutrons, but electrons do not follow neat circular paths. Instead, each electron is found in a region of space called an electron cloud or orbital, where it is most likely to be. The Bohr-Rutherford model is still very useful for showing how many electrons are in each shell, which is what you will use in this course.
Why models change
Each model was not simply wrong. Each explained the evidence available at the time, and each was replaced or improved when new evidence came along. That is a strength of science, not a weakness.

Worked examples

Reveal one step at a time and try to beat it to the next line.

Example 1
Explain how the gold foil results showed that Thomson's plum pudding model could not be correct.
Example 2
A student heats hydrogen gas in a tube and looks at the glow through a prism. She sees only four separate coloured lines, not a full rainbow. Which atomic model explains this, and how?
Example 3
Put these discoveries in order and name the particle or structure each one added to the model: neutron, electron, nucleus.

Where marks get lost

  • Thinking that the gold foil experiment showed the atom is solid. It showed the opposite: most alpha particles passed through, so the atom is mostly empty space.
  • Mixing up Thomson and Rutherford. Thomson found the electron (plum pudding); Rutherford found the nucleus (gold foil).
  • Saying Bohr discovered the neutron. Bohr described energy levels in 1913; Chadwick discovered the neutron in 1932.
  • Thinking older models were useless. Each one explained the evidence of its time, and the Bohr-Rutherford diagram is still used today to show electron shells.

Flashcards 8

Dalton's model (1803)
Thomson's model (1897)
Rutherford's model (1911)
Bohr's model (1913)
+ 4 more

Practice

1
Put these atomic models in the order they were proposed, from earliest to latest.
  1. 1Chadwick: neutrons in the nucleus
  2. 2Bohr: electrons in energy levels
  3. 3Rutherford: tiny dense nucleus
  4. 4Dalton: solid indivisible sphere
  5. 5Thomson: plum pudding with electrons
2
In the gold foil experiment, most alpha particles passed straight through the foil. What did this show?
3
Which observation led Rutherford to propose a tiny, dense, positive nucleus?
4
Match each scientist to the discovery or idea they are known for.
J. J. Thomson
Ernest Rutherford
Niels Bohr
James Chadwick
John Dalton
5
What is the common name for Thomson's model of the atom?
6
Which evidence did Bohr's model explain?
7
A nucleus is about 100 000 times smaller across than its atom. If an atom were blown up to the size of a 100 m wide stadium, how wide would the nucleus be, in millimetres?
mm
8
How did Chadwick know the particles he found had no charge?

Spot a mistake on this page? Let us know