Skip to content
Study Hall
Lesson 3 of 8Canada, 1982 to the Present
Unit 5 · Lesson 3 of 8

First Nations, Métis and Inuit Since 1982: From Oka to UNDRIP

How First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples pressed their rights after 1982: the 1990 standoff at Kanehsatà:ke (Oka), the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, court victories on title and rights, Nunavut and modern treaties, the residential school apology and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Idle No More, the MMIWG Inquiry, the child welfare rulings and the UNDRIP Act, and why reconciliation remains unfinished.

6 min read9 practice questionsInteractiveAsk AI about this →

Key things to remember

  1. 1Oka (Kanehsatà:ke) resistance: a 78-day standoff, July 11 to September 26, 1990, over land the Kanien'kehá:ka had long claimed.
  2. 2The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples reported in 1996 with 440 recommendations; Nunavut became a territory on April 1, 1999; the Nisga'a Final Agreement took effect in 2000.
  3. 3Prime Minister Harper apologized for residential schools on June 11, 2008; the TRC released 94 Calls to Action in 2015.
  4. 4The MMIWG Inquiry's final report (June 3, 2019) made 231 Calls for Justice; the UNDRIP Act became law on June 21, 2021.
  5. 5The first National Day for Truth and Reconciliation was held on September 30, 2021.

In the summer of 1990, the town of Oka, Quebec, planned to expand a private golf course and build housing on a forest known as the Pines, land that the Kanien'kehá:ka (Mohawk) of Kanehsatà:ke had claimed for centuries and which included a burial ground. When protesters blocked a dirt road into the Pines, Quebec's provincial police raided the barricade on July 11, 1990; in the gunfire, police Corporal Marcel Lemay was killed. Mohawks at nearby Kahnawà:ke blocked the Mercier Bridge into Montreal in solidarity. The standoff lasted 78 days, until September 26, and the Canadian Army was sent in. Abenaki filmmaker Alanis Obomsawin filmed behind the barricades, and her documentary Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance (1993) showed the crisis from inside. Oka forced the country to face land claims that had been ignored for generations, and it is a good starting point for this lesson: what has changed for First Nations, Métis and Inuit since 1982, and what has not?

ConfrontationInquiry or reportLand, rights and lawAcknowledgement1990–2000: confrontation, a royal commission and new agreements199019921994199619982000July 11 – Sept 26, 1990Kanehsatà:ke resistance (theOka Crisis): a 78-day standoffover Mohawk landApril 1, 1999Nunavut becomes a territory,following the 1993 Inuit landclaims agreementNov 21, 1996The Royal Commission onAboriginal Peoples releases itsfive-volume reportMay 11, 2000Nisga'a Final Agreement takeseffect: the first modern treatyin BC, with self-government2008–2021: apology, truth-telling and new laws20082010201220142016201820202022June 11, 2008Prime Minister StephenHarper apologizes forresidential schoolsJune 3, 2019MMIWG Inquiry finalreport, with 231 Calls forJusticeSept 30, 2021First National Day forTruth and Reconciliation2015Truth and ReconciliationCommission final report, with94 Calls to ActionJune 21, 2021UN Declaration on the Rights ofIndigenous Peoples Act becomeslaw
Fig 1Timeline from the Oka (Kanehsatà:ke) resistance in 1990 through the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples report (1996), the creation of Nunavut (April 1, 1999), the Nisga'a Final Agreement (2000), the federal apology for residential schools (June 11, 2008), the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's final report and 94 Calls to Action (2015), the MMIWG Inquiry's final report (2019), the UNDRIP Act (2021) and the first National Day for Truth and Reconciliation (September 30, 2021).

Land, title and self-government

After Oka, Ottawa created the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP). Its five-volume final report, released on November 21, 1996, called for a renewed relationship among nations based on mutual recognition, respect, sharing and responsibility, and made 440 recommendations, including recognizing Indigenous self-government. Governments acted on only a few of them at the time. Meanwhile, Indigenous nations used the courts and negotiations, building on section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 (see the first lesson of this unit).

Two Row Wampum — a Haudenosaunee understandingside by side — neither steers the other’s vesselCanoeHaudenosaunee waysShipEuropean wayseach keeps its own laws and ways, travelling together over timeRelationship view (Two Row)Text-only written viewRecordBeaded belt with oral teachingsWritten documentMeaning lives inThe relationship and what was saidThe exact written wordingOver timeRenewed and revisitedFixed at signingTwo ways of understanding an agreement. The labels describe each view; they do not rank them.
Fig 2Two ways of understanding a treaty: the Haudenosaunee Two Row Wampum, in which a canoe and a ship travel side by side without steering each other, compared with a written-document view, by where the record and its meaning live and how the agreement is treated over time.
YearDevelopmentSignificance
1985Bill C-31 amends the Indian ActRestored status to many First Nations women and their children, though inequalities in status rules continued for years
1997Delgamuukw decision (Gitxsan and Wet'suwet'en)Supreme Court accepted oral histories as evidence and described what Aboriginal title means
1999Nunavut becomes a territory on April 1Created through the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement (1993); a territory with a large Inuit majority and Inuktitut as an official language
2000Nisga'a Final Agreement takes effectA modern treaty in British Columbia that included land and self-government for the Nisga'a Nation
2003R. v. PowleySupreme Court recognized Métis harvesting rights under section 35, in a case from Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
2005Nunatsiavut Government establishedInuit self-government in northern Labrador
2014Tsilhqot'in decisionFirst time the Supreme Court declared Aboriginal title to a specific area of land
2016Daniels decisionMétis and non-status First Nations people are "Indians" under federal jurisdiction in section 91(24)
Key legal and political developments affecting First Nations, Métis and Inuit since 1982.

Residential schools: survivors, apology and the TRC

The last federally funded residential school closed in 1996 (see Unit 4 for the system's history). Survivors had begun speaking publicly: in 1990 Phil Fontaine, then Grand Chief of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs, described the abuse he suffered at school. Thousands of survivors sued, leading to the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, which took effect in 2007, provided compensation and created a truth commission. On June 11, 2008, Prime Minister Stephen Harper apologized in the House of Commons, with Indigenous leaders present on the floor of the House, for the schools' aim of removing children from their families and cultures. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), chaired by Justice Murray Sinclair, heard from thousands of survivors and in 2015 issued 94 Calls to Action. It concluded that the system was part of a policy it described as cultural genocide, and documented that thousands of children died at the schools.

Loading interactive…
Explore treaties, laws, court decisions and movements from 1763 to 2021, filter them by category, then test yourself by putting events in order.
Since 2021: searches, a national day and further apologies
In May 2021, Tk'emlúps te Secwépemc announced that a ground-penetrating radar survey near the former Kamloops Indian Residential School had found what appeared to be many unmarked graves of children; other First Nations soon announced findings from their own searches. Public grief and anger followed across Canada. Parliament made September 30 the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, first observed in 2021 and linked to Orange Shirt Day, which began in 2013 with survivor Phyllis Webstad's story. On July 25, 2022, at Maskwacis, Alberta, Pope Francis apologized for the role that many members of the Catholic Church had played in the schools. In October 2022 the House of Commons unanimously passed a motion recognizing the residential school system as genocide.

Activism, inquiries and new laws

  • Idle No More (from late 2012): started by four women in Saskatchewan (Jessica Gordon, Sylvia McAdam, Sheelah McLean and Nina Wilson) to oppose a federal budget bill that changed environmental protections for waterways and rules for reserve lands; it spread into round dances and rallies across Canada and abroad.
  • Child welfare: on January 26, 2016, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ruled that Ottawa discriminated against First Nations children by underfunding child welfare on reserves and failing to apply Jordan's Principle, a 2007 commitment that First Nations children get the services they need without delays over which government pays. After years of further orders, the Federal Court approved a compensation settlement of about 23 billion dollars in October 2023; negotiations over long-term reform continued.
  • Missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls: the National Inquiry (2016–2019) released its final report on June 3, 2019, with 231 Calls for Justice. It concluded that the violence amounted to a race-based genocide; some commentators disputed the use of that term, while many families and advocates welcomed it.
  • UNDRIP: Canada was one of four countries to vote against the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007, endorsed it in 2010, and passed the UNDRIP Act on June 21, 2021, committing to align federal laws with it.
  • Leadership: Mary Simon, an Inuk leader from Nunavik, became the first Indigenous Governor General in July 2021.
Analyse from more than one perspective
Reconciliation means different things to different people. For many First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities it means land, self-government, clean drinking water on reserves, language revitalization and control over child welfare, not only apologies. Governments have pointed to settlements, new laws and funding. Many Canadians support reconciliation in principle but disagree about pipelines, resource projects and land claims that affect their own regions. A strong answer names whose perspective you are describing and what evidence supports it.

Worked examples

Reveal one step at a time and try to beat it to the next line.

Example 1
Explain the historical significance of the Oka (Kanehsatà:ke) resistance of 1990.
Example 2
Compare the 2008 residential school apology with the TRC's 94 Calls to Action. Why did many survivors say an apology was not enough?
Example 3
Explain why the Tsilhqot'in decision (2014) was a turning point compared with Calder (1973) and Delgamuukw (1997).

Where marks get lost

  • Thinking residential schools ended long ago. The last federally funded school closed in 1996.
  • Treating the 2008 apology as the end of the story. The TRC (2008–2015), the 94 Calls to Action and later inquiries showed that the effects continue.
  • Using "Aboriginal" or "Indian" for everyone. Name First Nations, Métis and Inuit specifically; use legal names such as the Indian Act only where they are titles.
  • Assuming all Indigenous peoples have the same goals. Inuit pursued Nunavut and land claims, the Nisga'a negotiated a treaty, Métis won harvesting rights in court, and nations often disagree with one another about specific projects.
  • Describing the Oka standoff only as a crisis of law and order. Explain the long-term cause: an unresolved land claim over the Pines and a burial ground.

Flashcards 9

Oka (Kanehsatà:ke) resistance
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples
Nunavut
Nisga'a Final Agreement
+ 5 more

Practice

1
Put these events in chronological order, earliest first.
  1. 1The TRC releases its 94 Calls to Action
  2. 2Prime Minister Harper apologizes for residential schools
  3. 3The UNDRIP Act becomes law
  4. 4The standoff at Kanehsatà:ke (Oka)
  5. 5The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples releases its final report
  6. 6Nunavut becomes a territory
2
How many Calls to Action did the Truth and Reconciliation Commission issue in 2015?
3
Match each court decision to what it established.
Delgamuukw (1997)
R. v. Powley (2003)
Tsilhqot'in (2014)
Daniels (2016)
4
What was the immediate cause of the 1990 standoff at Kanehsatà:ke?
5
Which territory was created on April 1, 1999, as a result of an Inuit land claims agreement?
6
Which statement about the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) is accurate?
7
What did the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal rule in January 2016?
8
What date is the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation? (Give the month and day.)
9
Which group started the Idle No More movement in 2012?

Spot a mistake on this page? Let us know