Skip to content
Study Hall
Lesson 7 of 8Canada, 1982 to the Present
Unit 5 · Lesson 7 of 8

Acknowledging the Past: Apologies, Redress and Commemoration

Why Canadian governments have apologized and offered redress for past injustices, from Japanese Canadian internment, the Chinese head tax and residential schools to the Komagata Maru, the LGBT Purge and the MS St. Louis, how Canada commemorates international tragedies such as the Holocaust, the Holodomor and the Armenian genocide, and how to assess whether an acknowledgement is significant.

5 min read8 practice questionsInteractiveAsk AI about this →

Key things to remember

  1. 1Japanese Canadian Redress (September 22, 1988): apology, 21,000 dollars per eligible survivor, a community fund, pardons and restored citizenship.
  2. 2Apologies: Chinese head tax (June 22, 2006), residential schools (June 11, 2008), Komagata Maru (May 18, 2016), LGBT Purge (November 28, 2017), MS St. Louis (November 7, 2018).
  3. 3Parliament recognized the Holodomor as a genocide in 2008 and created Holodomor Memorial Day (fourth Saturday of November).
  4. 4Holocaust Memorial Day (Yom ha-Shoah) was created by law in 2003; the National Holocaust Monument opened in Ottawa in 2017.
  5. 5Most acknowledgements followed long campaigns by the affected communities; their significance depends on specificity, action and community acceptance.

On September 22, 1988, Prime Minister Brian Mulroney stood in the House of Commons and apologized to Japanese Canadians for their forced removal from the British Columbia coast, internment, dispossession and deportation during and after the Second World War (see Unit 3). The apology came with a redress agreement, won after years of campaigning by the National Association of Japanese Canadians: 21,000 dollars for each eligible survivor, a community fund, pardons for people convicted under wartime orders, and restored citizenship for those who had been deported. Survivors who had lost homes, fishing boats and farms decades earlier heard the government admit it had been wrong. Since then, Canadian governments have issued many apologies and recognitions. Why would a government apologize for actions taken by leaders long dead, and what difference does it make?

Apology or redressRecognition or commemoration1988–2008198819921996200020042008September 1988Japanese Canadian Redress:an apology, $21,000 toeach surviving person anda community fundJune 22, 2006Apology in the House ofCommons for the Chinesehead taxJune 11, 2008Apology for residentialschoolsNovember 2003Holocaust Memorial Day Act: Yomha-Shoah is marked each yearMay 29, 2008Parliament recognizes theHolodomor as a genocide andsets a memorial day2016–202220162017201820192020202120222023May 18, 2016Apology in the House ofCommons for the KomagataMaru (1914)Nov 7, 2018Apology for turning awaythe MS St. Louis (1939)and for Canada'santisemitic refugee policyJuly 9, 2022Apology to descendants ofNo. 2 ConstructionBattalion, a Black unit ofthe First World WarSept 27, 2017National Holocaust Monumentunveiled in OttawaMarch 2021House of Commons votes torecognize August 1 asEmancipation Day
Fig 1Timeline of public acknowledgements in Canada: Japanese Canadian Redress (1988), the Chinese head tax apology (2006), the residential schools apology (2008), Parliament's recognition of the Holodomor (2008), the Komagata Maru apology (2016), the MS St. Louis apology (2018), Holocaust remembrance (the Holocaust Memorial Day Act of 2003 and the National Holocaust Monument of 2017), the recognition of Emancipation Day (2021) and the 2022 apology to descendants of the No. 2 Construction Battalion.

Ways of acknowledging the past

TypeWhat it involvesExample
Formal apologyA government states that a past action was wrong and expresses regret, often in ParliamentResidential schools apology, June 11, 2008
Redress or compensationPayments, funds or legal changes to repair some of the harmJapanese Canadian Redress Agreement, 1988
Recognition by law or motionParliament officially names an event, often as a genocide, and may create a memorial dayHolodomor Memorial Day Act, 2008
Monuments, museums and plaquesPhysical places of memory and learningNational Holocaust Monument, Ottawa (2017); Canadian Museum for Human Rights, Winnipeg (2014)
Days of remembranceAnnual days that keep the memory publicNational Day for Truth and Reconciliation (September 30)
Forms of public acknowledgement and commemoration.

Acknowledging wrongs committed in Canada

YearAcknowledgementThe past wrong
1988Apology and redress to Japanese CanadiansRemoval, internment, dispossession and deportation, 1942–1949
2005, 2008Law recognizing Ukrainian Canadian internment; a commemorative fund (2008)Internment of thousands of "enemy aliens", many Ukrainian, during the First World War (see Unit 2)
2006Apology in the House of Commons and symbolic payments to surviving head tax payers or their spousesThe Chinese head tax (1885–1923) and the Chinese Immigration Act, 1923, which almost entirely banned Chinese immigration until 1947
2008Apology to former students of residential schoolsRemoving Indigenous children from their families to assimilate them
2010Apology to Inuit for the High Arctic relocationMoving Inuit families from northern Quebec and Baffin Island to the High Arctic in the 1950s
2016Apology in the House of Commons for the Komagata MaruIn 1914, 376 passengers from British India, most of them Sikh, were refused entry at Vancouver and forced to return
2017Apology for the LGBT PurgeFrom the 1950s to the 1990s, federal employees and military members were investigated and fired or discharged because of their sexual orientation or gender identity
2018Apology for the MS St. LouisIn 1939, Canada refused entry to 907 Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany; 254 of them were later murdered in the Holocaust
2021Apology for the internment of Italian CanadiansHundreds of Italian Canadians were interned during the Second World War
Federal acknowledgements of injustices committed in Canada or by Canadian governments.
Who pushes for acknowledgement?
Almost every apology came after years of campaigning by the affected community: the National Association of Japanese Canadians, Chinese Canadian groups that collected the stories of head tax payers, Ukrainian Canadian civil liberties organizations, Sikh Canadian organizations, residential school survivors and LGBTQ+ public servants and veterans. Acknowledgement is usually the result of persistent activism, not a government's sudden change of heart.

Commemorating international tragedies

  • The Holocaust: Parliament created Holocaust Memorial Day (Yom ha-Shoah) by law in 2003; the National Holocaust Monument opened in Ottawa on September 27, 2017. Canada also adopted an internationally used working definition of antisemitism in 2019 (see Unit 3 for the Holocaust and Canada's response).
  • The Holodomor: in 2008 Parliament passed a law recognizing the 1932–1933 man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine as a genocide and creating Holodomor Memorial Day on the fourth Saturday of November (see Unit 3).
  • The Armenian genocide: the Senate (2002) and the House of Commons (April 21, 2004) passed motions recognizing the 1915 killing of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as genocide.
  • Rwanda and Srebrenica: Canadian governments have recognized the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda and the 1995 genocide at Srebrenica, in Bosnia, both of which happened while UN peacekeepers were present (see the lesson on Canada in the world).

Recognizing international tragedies matters in Canada because many Canadians are survivors or descendants of survivors: Holocaust survivors who rebuilt their lives in Montreal, Toronto and Winnipeg, Ukrainian Canadians whose families lived through the Holodomor, Armenian, Rwandan and Bosnian Canadian communities. Recognition affirms their history as part of Canada's heritage, and it is often contested by foreign governments: Turkey, for example, rejects the term genocide for the Armenian killings, and Russia rejects it for the Holodomor. Deciding to recognize a genocide is therefore also a foreign policy decision.

Loading interactive…
Filter the timeline of events from 1914 to 2022 by theme, such as rights and immigration, to place past injustices and apologies in time, then put events in order.
Assessing the significance of an acknowledgement
Ask four questions. Was it specific about what was wrong and who was harmed? Did it come with action, such as compensation, legal change or education, or only words? Did the affected community accept it, and how did they take part in shaping it? Did it change how Canadians understand their history? For example, many Japanese Canadians saw the 1988 redress as meaningful because it included compensation and was negotiated with them, while some Chinese Canadians criticized the 2006 head tax redress because symbolic payments went only to the few surviving payers or their spouses, not to their descendants.
Debates about apologies
Some people argue that governments should not apologize for decisions made under the values of another era, or worry that apologies divide Canadians into groups. Others respond that the government is a continuing institution responsible for its past laws, and that the people harmed, or their children, are still alive. Many survivors say that an apology without action is incomplete. Each of these perspectives draws on a different idea of what citizenship and national memory should mean.

Worked examples

Reveal one step at a time and try to beat it to the next line.

Example 1
Compare the 1988 Japanese Canadian Redress with the 2006 Chinese head tax apology. Which was more significant, and why?
Example 2
Assess the significance of the 2016 apology for the Komagata Maru incident.
Example 3
Evaluate the claim: "Apologies for the past are meaningless because today's government did not commit the wrong."

Where marks get lost

  • Thinking only Indigenous peoples have received apologies. Japanese, Chinese, South Asian, Jewish, Ukrainian, Italian, Black and LGBTQ+ Canadians have also received federal acknowledgements.
  • Mixing up the event and the apology dates, for example writing that the Komagata Maru arrived in 2016. The incident was in 1914; the apology in the House was in 2016.
  • Assuming every apology included compensation. Some did (Japanese Canadian Redress), some offered limited payments (Chinese head tax) and some were words only.
  • Treating recognition of international genocides as purely symbolic. It also involves foreign policy and is often disputed by other governments.
  • Forgetting that communities campaigned for decades. Acknowledgements are usually the result of activism, not a government's own initiative.

Flashcards 8

Japanese Canadian Redress (1988)
Chinese head tax apology (2006)
Komagata Maru apology (2016)
LGBT Purge apology (2017)
+ 4 more

Practice

1
Put these federal acknowledgements in chronological order, earliest first.
  1. 1Apology for the LGBT Purge
  2. 2Apology for the Komagata Maru incident
  3. 3Apology for turning away the MS St. Louis
  4. 4Apology and redress for Japanese Canadians
  5. 5Apology for the Chinese head tax
  6. 6Apology to former students of residential schools
2
Match each injustice to the community that campaigned for its acknowledgement.
Wartime internment and dispossession, 1942–1949
The head tax and the 1923 exclusion law
The Komagata Maru incident of 1914
Refusing entry to refugees on the MS St. Louis in 1939
First World War internment of "enemy aliens"
3
Under the 1988 Japanese Canadian Redress Agreement, how many dollars did each eligible survivor receive?
dollars
4
What 1932–1933 man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine did Parliament recognize as a genocide in 2008?
5
Why did some Chinese Canadians criticize the 2006 head tax redress?
6
Which of these is an example of commemorating an international tragedy rather than acknowledging a wrong committed by Canada?
7
According to the criteria for significance, which feature would make an apology more meaningful to the people harmed?
8
In what Canadian city did the National Holocaust Monument open in 2017?

Spot a mistake on this page? Let us know