The energy released when a nucleus splits or fuses dwarfs anything chemistry can offer — roughly a million times more per kilogram than burning coal. That single fact is why nuclear power exists, and why the questions around it are about waste, risk and cost rather than about whether it works.
Fission and fusion
- A heavy nucleus (uranium-235) splits into lighter ones
- Triggered by absorbing a neutron
- Releases 2–3 more neutrons, enabling a chain reaction
- The technology every power reactor uses today
- Produces long-lived radioactive waste
- Two light nuclei (hydrogen isotopes) join into a heavier one
- Needs enormous temperature and pressure to start
- Powers the Sun and every star
- Still experimental — no net-energy power plant yet
- Waste is far shorter-lived
In a reactor, the chain reaction is deliberately held at a steady rate. Control rods made of neutron-absorbing material slide in and out to soak up excess neutrons, the moderator slows neutrons so they are more readily absorbed by the fuel, and the coolant carries heat away to make steam. The steam then drives an ordinary turbine and generator — the nuclear part only replaces the furnace.
Radioactive decay and half-life
Unstable nuclei decay at random, but in such vast numbers that the rate is completely predictable. The half-life is the time for half the nuclei in a sample to decay. It is a fixed property of each isotope, unaffected by temperature, pressure or chemistry.
| Isotope | Half-life | Used for |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon-14 | 5730 years | Dating organic remains up to ~50 000 years old |
| Cobalt-60 | 5.27 years | Cancer radiotherapy, sterilizing equipment |
| Technetium-99m | 6 hours | Medical imaging — short enough to clear the body quickly |
| Iodine-131 | 8 days | Treating thyroid conditions |
| Uranium-235 | 704 million years | Reactor fuel |
| Plutonium-239 | 24 100 years | The reason spent fuel needs long-term storage |
Where Ontario's electricity comes from
Ontario generates roughly half to sixty per cent of its electricity from nuclear, around a quarter from hydroelectric, and the rest from wind, natural gas, solar and biomass. The province closed its last coal plant in 2014 — at the time the largest single greenhouse-gas reduction initiative in North America — which is why Ontario's grid is among the cleanest on the continent.
| Source | Renewable? | Strengths | Costs and limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuclear | No | No greenhouse gases in operation; huge steady output; small land use | Long-lived waste; very high build cost; slow to construct |
| Hydroelectric | Yes | Reliable, long-lived, storable, no emissions in operation | Floods land; disrupts fish and river ecosystems; sites are limited |
| Wind | Yes | No fuel, no emissions, falling cost | Intermittent; needs backup or storage; land and wildlife concerns |
| Solar | Yes | No fuel or emissions; works on existing rooftops | Intermittent; poor winter output at Ontario's latitude |
| Natural gas | No | Fast to start, fills gaps in demand | Emits and methane leaks upstream |
| Biomass | Yes* | Uses waste material; dispatchable | Emits when burnt; only near-neutral if regrown |
- Conservation beats generation. The cheapest and cleanest kilowatt-hour is the one never used — insulation, LED lighting and efficient appliances all cut demand directly.
- Every source has costs. Hydro floods habitat, wind kills birds and bats, solar panels need mining and eventual recycling, nuclear leaves waste. The comparison is between trade-offs, not between a perfect option and a flawed one.
- Life-cycle analysis matters. Comparing sources fairly means counting construction, fuel, operation and decommissioning — not just what comes out of the stack while running.