Exponential functions model anything that changes by the same percentage every fixed interval — a bacteria colony doubling every hour, savings earning compound interest, or a hot drink cooling toward room temperature. A linear function changes by adding the same amount each step; an exponential function changes by multiplying by the same factor each step. That one difference (adding versus multiplying) is why an exponential starts slowly and then explodes, and why its graph has a shape no line or parabola can copy. The graphs of all basic exponentials share the same distinctive features, no matter what the base is.

Adding versus multiplying: linear vs exponential
Compare with in a table with going up by 1. The linear function goes : every step adds 2, so the first differences are constant. The exponential goes : its first differences are (not constant, and growing), but every step multiplies by 2, so the ratios are constant. The reason is the product law: , so moving one unit right always multiplies the output by . Notice that the differences of an exponential are themselves exponential, which is why "check the differences" never settles down for these functions.
| x | First difference | Ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 3 | +2 | 2 | ×2 |
| 2 | 5 | +2 | 4 | ×2 |
| 3 | 7 | +2 | 8 | ×2 |
| 4 | 9 | +2 | 16 | ×2 |
The base decides growth or decay
For with and : if , the function is increasing ("growth") — larger always gives a bigger output. If , the function is decreasing ("decay") — larger gives a smaller (but still positive) output. is excluded because for every , which is just a constant, not genuinely exponential. Negative bases are excluded too: flips sign at every whole number and is not even real, so its "graph" is a scatter of disconnected points. Watch for decay written in disguise: equals , so it is decay even though the base you see is 2.
- Graph rises left to right
- e.g.
- Gets steeper as x increases
- Flattens toward the asymptote y = 0 on the left
- Graph falls left to right
- e.g.
- Flattens toward 0 as x increases
- Rises steeply on the left
Key features (both cases)
- Always passes through , since for any valid base. Two more easy points are and , enough for a quick sketch.
- Horizontal asymptote at — the graph gets arbitrarily close to the -axis but never touches or crosses it, because for every real . So there is no -intercept.
- Domain: all real numbers, .
- Range: , i.e. — never zero, never negative.
- Always increasing () or always decreasing (), so it never turns around and passes the horizontal line test.
Exponential growth vs. polynomial growth
For small , a polynomial like can look bigger than an exponential like . But exponential growth eventually outpaces every polynomial, no matter how large its degree — because an exponential multiplies by the same factor at every step, while a polynomial's growth rate slows down relatively as increases. Going from to , grows by about 21% while grows by 100%, and that 100% never shrinks. In the table, and tie at and , and after that the exponential stays ahead for good. This is why early growth is so easy to underestimate in real life: a case count that doubles every three days looks harmless for the first couple of weeks and then can overwhelm a hospital system within a month, and a savings account earning compound interest looks almost linear for years before the curve bends sharply upward.
| x | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 3 | 9 | 8 |
| 4 | 16 | 16 |
| 5 | 25 | 32 |
| 10 | 100 | 1024 |