The photoelectric effect showed that light, long accepted as a wave, also behaves like a stream of particles. That raised an obvious and daring question: if waves can act like particles, can particles act like waves? The answer turned out to be yes, and it changed how physicists describe electrons, atoms and everything built from them. This lesson follows the evidence in both directions.
Photons carry momentum
If a photon is a particle, it should be able to collide with things and transfer momentum. In 1923 Arthur Compton fired X-rays at a solid target and measured the X-rays that scattered off its electrons. The scattered X-rays had a longer wavelength than the incoming ones, and the shift grew with the scattering angle. A wave scattering off a charge should come out with its wavelength unchanged. A photon behaving like a billiard ball, though, gives some of its energy and momentum to the electron it hits, so it leaves with less energy and therefore a longer wavelength. This Compton effect was strong evidence that photons carry momentum exactly as predicts.
Matter waves
In 1924 Louis de Broglie proposed that the relationship works both ways: any moving particle with momentum has an associated wavelength. For everyday objects this wavelength is absurdly small, because is so small and their masses are so large. For an electron, with its tiny mass, it comes out comparable to the spacing between atoms in a crystal — which suggests exactly how to test the idea.
Diffraction is only noticeable when a wave meets an opening or obstacle comparable in size to its wavelength. The regularly spaced atoms of a crystal act like a diffraction grating for waves with wavelengths around a tenth of a nanometre. In 1927 Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer directed a beam of electrons at a nickel crystal and found strong reflections only at particular angles — a diffraction pattern — and G. P. Thomson saw diffraction rings when electrons passed through thin metal foils. The measured wavelengths matched . Electron diffraction is the key evidence for the wave nature of matter, and electron microscopes exploit it: electron wavelengths are far shorter than those of visible light, so they can resolve far finer detail.
Energy levels and line spectra
A hot, low-pressure gas does not glow with a continuous rainbow. It emits only a few sharp wavelengths, a line spectrum unique to each element. Niels Bohr's 1913 model explained hydrogen's lines by allowing its electron only certain energy levels. An electron that drops from a higher level to a lower one emits a single photon carrying exactly the energy difference; an electron can jump up only by absorbing a photon with exactly the right energy. Matter waves later gave a reason for the allowed levels: an electron's wave must fit around the atom as a standing wave, a whole number of wavelengths, much like the harmonics on a guitar string.
- Bright lines on a dark background
- Produced by a hot, low-pressure gas
- Electrons drop to lower levels and emit photons
- Each line's energy equals one level gap
- Dark lines in an otherwise continuous spectrum
- Produced when white light passes through a cooler gas
- Electrons absorb photons and jump to higher levels
- Dark lines sit at the same wavelengths as that element's bright emission lines