Skip to content
Study Hall
Lesson 5 of 5Population Dynamics
Unit 5 · Lesson 5 of 5

Environmental Contaminants and Human Health

How endocrine disruptors such as synthetic estrogen, BPA, phthalates and PFAS interfere with hormones (including the Experimental Lakes Area whole-lake experiment), how mercury and lead harm the nervous system, the Grassy Narrows mercury case, the difference between bioaccumulation and biomagnification, and how dose-response curves are used to set safe limits.

6 min read11 practice questionsAsk AI about this →

Key things to remember

  1. 1Endocrine disruptors (EE2, BPA, phthalates, PFAS) mimic, block or interfere with hormones and can act at nanogram-per-litre levels.
  2. 2Experimental Lakes Area, Lake 260: about 5–6 ng/L of EE2 feminized male fathead minnows and collapsed the population; it recovered after additions stopped.
  3. 3Bioaccumulation: build-up within one organism. Biomagnification: concentration rises at each trophic level, so top predators carry the most.
  4. 4Biomagnifying substances are persistent, retained in fat or bound to protein, and slowly excreted. Biomagnification factor .
  5. 5Grassy Narrows: mercury released at Dryden (1962–1970) became methylmercury, biomagnified in fish and caused Minamata disease symptoms.
  6. 6Dose-response: threshold, NOAEL and LD₅₀; tolerable intakes are set by dividing the NOAEL by safety factors.

A growing human population releases chemicals that never existed before the twentieth century, and some of them come back to us through our food and water. Most do little harm, because the body breaks them down and excretes them. A few are dangerous at astonishingly low levels, either because they fit a hormone receptor or because they persist and become more concentrated as they move up a food chain. Understanding which chemicals behave this way, and why, is what allows scientists and governments to set limits, ban products and protect the communities most exposed. This lesson connects your knowledge of hormones, the nervous system and food chains to the health of people and ecosystems.

Endocrine disruptors: chemicals that fit hormone receptors

An endocrine disruptor mimics, blocks or interferes with a hormone. Because hormones act at nanomolar concentrations and are amplified by their target cells, a disruptor can act at doses far below those that are toxic in the usual sense. The strongest Canadian evidence comes from the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA), a set of small lakes near Kenora in northwestern Ontario reserved for whole-ecosystem experiments since 1968. As described in the endocrine lesson, researchers led by Karen Kidd added ethinylestradiol (EE2), the synthetic estrogen in birth control pills, to Lake 260 for three summers (2001 to 2003) at about 5 to 6 nanograms per litre, similar to levels found downstream of some sewage plants. Male fathead minnows began making vitellogenin, an egg-yolk protein normally made only by females, and developed egg cells in their testes. Reproduction failed, and within two years the lake's minnow population had collapsed to near extinction. After the additions stopped, the population recovered. A whole-lake design mattered: laboratory tanks cannot show a population crash that unfolds over generations in a real food web, while untreated reference lakes showed the collapse was not caused by weather or disease.

ContaminantWhere it comes fromHow it disruptsCanadian action
EE2 (synthetic estrogen)Excreted in urine; passes through many wastewater plantsBinds estrogen receptors; feminizes male fishBetter wastewater treatment removes much of it
BPA (bisphenol A)Polycarbonate plastics and can linings; leaches more when heated or scratchedWeakly mimics estrogenIn 2010 Canada became the first country to declare BPA toxic and banned polycarbonate baby bottles containing it
PhthalatesPlasticizers that make PVC (vinyl) soft; some cosmeticsInterfere with testosterone during fetal development (anti-androgenic)Six phthalates restricted in soft vinyl children's toys and child-care products since 2011
PFAS ("forever chemicals")Non-stick and stain-resistant coatings, grease-proof packaging, firefighting foamBind blood proteins; linked to thyroid disruption, raised cholesterol and weaker vaccine responsesPFOS prohibited; Health Canada set a drinking-water objective of 30 ng/L for total PFAS in 2024
Each disruptor works because its shape lets it bind a hormone receptor or interfere with hormone production and transport.

Bioaccumulation and biomagnification

Biomagnification of DDT in an aquatic food chainTypical concentrations in body tissue, parts per million (ppm)0.04 ppmZooplanktonprimary consumers↑ ≈ ×13 0000.5 ppmSmall fishsecondary consumers↑ ×12.52 ppmLarge fishtertiary consumers↑ ×425 ppmFish-eating birdstop predators, e.g. ospreys↑ ×12.5Water: 0.000003 ppm= DDT. It is fat-soluble and is not broken down or excreted, so it builds up in tissues (bioaccumulation).Each predator eats many prey, so the dose multiplies at every level (biomagnification):the birds carry about 8 million times the concentration in the water.
Fig 1A persistent contaminant becomes more concentrated at each trophic level, so top predators carry the highest levels.
ABioaccumulation
  • Build-up of a substance within one organism over its lifetime
  • Happens when intake is faster than breakdown and excretion
  • Older, larger individuals carry more
  • Example: lead stored in human bone for decades
BBiomagnification
  • Increase in concentration from one trophic level to the next
  • Happens because each predator eats many prey and keeps their contaminant
  • Top predators carry the most
  • Example: methylmercury in walleye, DDT in fish-eating birds

Biomagnification needs three properties. The substance must be persistent (not broken down by enzymes or light), retained in tissue (dissolved in fat, like DDT and PCBs, or bound to proteins, like methylmercury and PFAS) and slowly excreted. Then the energy pyramid does the rest. Only about 10% of the energy at one trophic level reaches the next, so a predator must eat roughly ten times its own mass in prey. The energy is used up in respiration, but the contaminant stays. A widely cited summary of 1960s measurements in a Long Island estuary gives DDT at roughly 0.000003 ppm in the water, 0.04 ppm in zooplankton, 0.5 ppm in small fish, 2 ppm in larger fish and about 25 ppm in fish-eating birds. In those birds DDT's breakdown product interfered with calcium deposition in eggshells, which thinned and broke, and peregrine falcon and bald eagle populations crashed until DDT was restricted in the 1970s.

A factor greater than 1 means the substance is magnifying.

Mercury, Grassy Narrows and lead

From 1962 to 1970, a chlor-alkali plant serving the pulp and paper mill in Dryden, Ontario, released roughly 9 to 10 tonnes of mercury into the English-Wabigoon River. Downstream live the Anishinaabe communities of Grassy Narrows First Nation (Asubpeeschoseewagong) and Wabaseemoong (Whitedog), whose diet, culture and livelihoods centred on the river's fish. Bacteria in the river sediments convert inorganic mercury into methylmercury, which is absorbed easily, binds to proteins in fish muscle and biomagnifies, reaching the highest levels in walleye and other predators. Methylmercury crosses the blood-brain barrier and the placenta and kills neurons, causing the symptoms of Minamata disease, named for a Japanese poisoning: numbness in the hands and feet, tunnel vision, tremors, loss of coordination and slurred speech. The commercial fishery closed in 1970, taking jobs and a way of life with it, and many residents still live with symptoms. Because mercury remains in the sediments, fish are still contaminated more than 50 years later. Ontario committed funding in 2017 to study and clean up the river, and in 2020 the federal government agreed to fund a care home in the community for people with mercury poisoning; community members continue to press for full remediation and compensation.

FeatureMethylmercuryLead
Main sourcesPredatory fish from contaminated waterOld paint, lead service pipes in older homes, historic leaded gasoline (phased out in Canada by 1990)
How it harmsBinds sulfur groups in proteins, damaging neuronsMimics calcium, disrupting enzymes and nerve signalling; stored in bone
Most vulnerableFetuses and young children (developing nervous system)Young children: lowers IQ and attention; no known safe level
Food-chain behaviourStrongly biomagnifiesBioaccumulates in each organism, but does not biomagnify much in food webs
Canadian limit0.5 ppm in most commercial fish5 µg/L maximum in drinking water (2019)
Both are neurotoxic metals, but only methylmercury climbs the food chain efficiently.

Dose-response: the dose makes the poison

Toxicologists test a chemical at several doses and plot the response, for example the percentage of test animals affected. Most curves are S-shaped: below a threshold there is no measurable effect, the highest dose with no observed adverse effect is the NOAEL, and the dose that kills half the test population is the LD₅₀. Regulators divide the NOAEL by safety factors (often 10 for differences between species and 10 more for differences among people) to set a tolerable daily intake. Endocrine disruptors complicate this: some show effects at low doses that disappear at higher ones, and timing matters as much as dose, because a brief exposure during fetal development can permanently change how organs form. This is why limits for pregnant people and children are often stricter.

Worked examples

Reveal one step at a time and try to beat it to the next line.

Example 1
In the Long Island estuary study, DDT was about 0.000003 ppm in the water, 0.04 ppm in zooplankton and 25 ppm in fish-eating birds. Calculate the biomagnification factor (a) from water to zooplankton and (b) from water to the birds, and explain why it is so large.
Example 2
Health Canada's tolerable daily intake of methylmercury for people who are or may become pregnant is 0.2 µg per kg of body mass per day. A 60 kg person eats one 150 g walleye meal containing 1.2 µg of methylmercury per gram. Compare the meal with a week's tolerable intake.
Example 3
Explain how the design of the Lake 260 experiment allowed researchers to conclude that EE2 caused the fathead minnow collapse.
Example 4
In a toxicity test, a pesticide killed 10% of rats at 10 mg/kg, 30% at 20 mg/kg, 70% at 40 mg/kg and 95% at 80 mg/kg. Estimate the LD₅₀ by linear interpolation, and explain what it means.

Where marks get lost

  • Using bioaccumulation and biomagnification as synonyms. Bioaccumulation happens within one organism over time; biomagnification is the increase from one trophic level to the next.
  • Assuming a chemical is safe because its concentration in the water is tiny. Biomagnification can multiply it millions of times by the top of the food chain, and endocrine disruptors act at nanogram levels.
  • Thinking every toxic metal biomagnifies. Methylmercury does strongly; lead bioaccumulates in bone but does not magnify much through food webs.
  • Treating the LD₅₀ as a safe dose. It is the dose that kills half the test animals; safe intakes are set far lower, from the NOAEL divided by safety factors.
  • Describing the Grassy Narrows case as only a health problem. The contamination also destroyed a fishery, jobs and a traditional food source, which is why social and economic impacts are part of the case.

Flashcards 10

Endocrine disruptor
Experimental Lakes Area (Lake 260)
Vitellogenin
Bioaccumulation
+ 6 more

Practice

1
Order these organisms from the lowest to the highest expected concentration of methylmercury in a northern Ontario lake.
  1. 1People who eat walleye as a staple food
  2. 2Walleye
  3. 3Small fish such as minnows
  4. 4Algae (phytoplankton)
  5. 5Zooplankton
2
Match each contaminant to a common source.
EE2
BPA
Phthalates
PFAS
Lead
3
Zooplankton contain 0.04 ppm of a pesticide and the small fish that eat them contain 0.5 ppm. What is the biomagnification factor from zooplankton to small fish? (1 decimal place)
4
A tap-water sample contains 0.012 mg/L of lead. Canada's maximum acceptable concentration is 0.005 mg/L. How many times the limit is this? (1 decimal place)
times
5
A substance has a NOAEL of 5.0 mg per kg of body mass per day in rats. Regulators apply safety factors of 10 (rat to human) and 10 (variation among people). What is the tolerable daily intake in mg/kg per day? (2 decimal places)
mg/kg per day
6
Which property makes a contaminant most likely to biomagnify?
7
Why did the Lake 260 experiment use untreated reference lakes?
8
Why is methylmercury especially dangerous during pregnancy?
9
What happened to the fathead minnow population in Lake 260 after the additions of synthetic estrogen stopped?
10
What is the term for the increase in a contaminant's concentration at each higher level of a food chain?
11
Bacteria in river sediments convert inorganic mercury into what more dangerous form that biomagnifies in fish?

Spot a mistake on this page? Let us know