Skip to content
Study Hall
Lesson 1 of 5Evolution
Unit 2 · Lesson 1 of 5

The Theory of Evolution and Its Evidence

The ideas that led to Darwin's theory, why Lamarck's hypothesis was rejected, and the independent lines of evidence (fossils, biogeography, anatomy, embryology and DNA) that support evolution.

6 min read10 practice questionsAsk AI about this →

Key things to remember

  1. 1Evolution is descent with modification: species change over generations and share common ancestors.
  2. 2Lamarck's inheritance of acquired characteristics was rejected because changes to body cells during life are not passed on in eggs and sperm.
  3. 3Homologous structures (same origin, different function) show common ancestry; analogous structures (same function, different origin) do not.
  4. 4Radiometric dating: after half-lives, the fraction of isotope remaining is ; carbon-14 has years.
  5. 5Five independent lines of evidence support evolution: fossils, biogeography, comparative anatomy, embryology and molecular biology (DNA and proteins).

A bat's wing, a whale's flipper and your arm look nothing alike on the outside, yet inside they are built from the same set of bones in the same order. Why would a flying animal, a swimming animal and a tool-using animal share one skeletal blueprint? Evolution answers that question: species change over many generations, and species that share a common ancestor inherit a shared body plan that has been modified for different ways of life. In this topic you will see where the idea came from and, more importantly, the evidence that makes evolution one of the best-supported explanations in all of science.

Ideas that shaped Darwin's thinking

  • Charles Lyell (geologist) argued in Principles of Geology that Earth's features were shaped by slow processes we can still watch today, such as erosion and sediment deposition, acting over enormous spans of time. This idea is called uniformitarianism. If Earth is very old, there has been enough time for small changes in living things to add up to large ones. Darwin read Lyell's work during his voyage.
  • Thomas Malthus (economist) wrote in 1798 that human populations tend to grow faster than their food supply, so many individuals must face shortages, disease and competition. Darwin applied this to every species: far more offspring are produced than can survive, so there is a constant struggle for existence.
  • Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (naturalist) was one of the first to propose that species change over time. His mechanism, however, was the inheritance of acquired characteristics: body parts that are used a lot grow stronger, unused parts shrink, and those changes are passed to offspring. His idea that species change was right; his mechanism was wrong.
  • Georges Cuvier (anatomist) showed from fossil bones that some animals, such as mammoths, no longer exist anywhere on Earth. That made extinction an accepted fact, and it meant the living world had not always looked the way it does now.
ALamarck: acquired characteristics (rejected)
  • Ancestral giraffes stretched their necks to reach high leaves.
  • Stretching made each giraffe's own neck longer during its lifetime.
  • Parents passed their stretched necks on to their young.
  • Problem: changes to body cells during life do not change the DNA in eggs and sperm, so they are not inherited.
BDarwin: natural selection (supported)
  • Ancestral giraffes already varied in neck length because of inherited differences.
  • When food was scarce, longer-necked individuals reached more leaves and survived better.
  • Survivors had more offspring, who inherited the genes for longer necks.
  • Over many generations, the average neck length of the population increased.

Charles Darwin sailed around the world aboard HMS Beagle from 1831 to 1836, collecting fossils and living specimens, including from the Galápagos Islands. Over the following two decades he built the case for evolution by natural selection. Alfred Russel Wallace reached the same idea independently, and their work was presented together in 1858. Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859. The central claims are that all living things are related through descent with modification from common ancestors, and that natural selection is a major cause of that modification.

What theory means in science
In everyday speech a theory is a guess. In science, a theory is a well-tested explanation that ties together a large body of evidence and has survived many attempts to prove it wrong. The theory of evolution sits alongside cell theory and atomic theory: its details are still being researched, but the fact that species have changed and share common ancestors is not in scientific doubt.

Evidence 1: the fossil record

A fossil is the preserved remains or trace of an organism from the past. In undisturbed sedimentary rock, lower layers were deposited first, so they are older. When palaeontologists compare layers, they find simpler, single-celled life in the oldest rocks and more complex organisms appearing later, and they find species that no longer exist. Transitional fossils show a mix of features from an ancestral group and a descendant group. Tiktaalik, found on Ellesmere Island in Nunavut, is about 375 million years old and has fish features (scales, gills, fins) together with features of four-limbed animals (a flat head, a neck, and fins containing wrist-like bones). Archaeopteryx, about 150 million years old, has feathers and wings like a bird but also teeth, clawed fingers and a long bony tail like small dinosaurs.

Radiometric dating: the amount of a radioactive isotope left falls by half every half-life.

Rock layers give relative ages (older or younger). Radiometric dating gives absolute ages in years. A radioactive isotope decays at a fixed rate, measured by its half-life, the time for half of it to decay. Carbon-14 has a half-life of about 5730 years and is used for once-living material up to roughly 50 000 years old; isotopes with half-lives of millions or billions of years are used to date rock. These methods place Earth's age at about 4.6 billion years, giving evolution the long time span that Lyell's geology suggested.

Evidence 2: biogeography

Biogeography is the study of where species live. If species had simply been placed where conditions suit them, islands with similar climates around the world would have similar species. Instead, island species most closely resemble species on the nearest mainland. The plants and animals of the Galápagos, for example, resemble those of mainland South America, which is what you would expect if ancestors arrived from that mainland and then changed. Likewise, Australia, isolated for a very long time, is dominated by marsupial mammals such as kangaroos and koalas that are found almost nowhere else.

Evidence 3: anatomy, embryology and DNA

Homologous Forelimbs: Same Bones, Different JobsHumanarm: graspingCatfront leg: walkingWhaleflipper: swimmingBatwing: flyinghumerusradiusulnacarpalsmetacarpalsphalangesHomologous: same bones in the same order, adapted for different functions, inherited from a common ancestor.Analogous: a bat wing and an insect wing both allow flight but are built differently, with no shared ancestral structure.
Fig 1The forelimbs of a human, cat, whale and bat contain the same bones in the same arrangement, modified for different functions.
Type of structureMeaningExampleWhat it tells us
HomologousSame underlying structure and origin, often different functionsHuman arm, cat leg, whale flipper, bat wingThe species share a common ancestor
AnalogousSame function, but different structure and originBird wing and butterfly wingSimilar environments can select for similar solutions (convergent evolution); not evidence of close relationship
VestigialReduced structure that has lost most or all of its original functionSmall pelvic bones in whales; reduced eyes in blind cave fish; the human tailboneThe species descended from ancestors in which the structure was fully functional
Comparing body structures across species.

Embryology adds more evidence. Early embryos of fish, reptiles, birds and mammals all have pharyngeal arches in the neck region and a tail extending past the anus. In fish the arches develop into gill supports; in mammals they develop into parts of the jaw, ear and throat. Shared early development points to shared ancestry. Finally, molecular evidence is the strongest of all. Nearly every organism uses the same genetic code, and the more closely two species are related by anatomy and fossils, the more similar their DNA and protein sequences are. Humans and chimpanzees, for instance, have DNA sequences that are about 98 to 99 percent identical in regions that can be directly compared. Independent lines of evidence (rocks, geography, bones, embryos and genes) all point to the same family tree.

Worked examples

Reveal one step at a time and try to beat it to the next line.

Example 1
A fossil bone contains 12.5% of the carbon-14 it would have had when the animal died. Carbon-14 has a half-life of 5730 years. How old is the bone?
Example 2
Model Malthus's argument with hypothetical numbers. A population of 1 million doubles every 25 years. The food supply starts out able to feed 1 million people and increases by enough to feed 1 million more every 25 years. Compare population and food capacity after 100 years.
Example 3
Blind cave fish live in completely dark caves. Their eyes are small and non-functional, while fish of the same species living in rivers have normal eyes. Explain the cave fish's eyes (a) as Lamarck would and (b) using modern evolutionary theory, and say why only one is accepted.
Example 4
Classify each pair as homologous or analogous, and say which pair is evidence of common ancestry: (a) a bat's wing and a human's arm; (b) a bat's wing and a moth's wing.

Where marks get lost

  • Saying "it's just a theory" as though a scientific theory were a guess. A scientific theory is a well-tested explanation supported by a large body of evidence.
  • Using analogous structures such as bird and insect wings as evidence that two groups are closely related. Only homologous structures show common ancestry.
  • Describing a vestigial structure as "completely useless". Vestigial means reduced from its ancestral function; the human tailbone, for example, still anchors muscles.
  • Explaining adaptation the Lamarckian way ("the animal needed longer legs, so it grew them and passed them on"). Individuals do not evolve; populations change as inherited variants become more or less common.
  • Saying humans evolved from chimpanzees. Humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor; neither species is the ancestor of the other.

Flashcards 9

Uniformitarianism (Lyell)
Malthus's key idea
Inheritance of acquired characteristics
Transitional fossil
+ 5 more

Practice

1
Which idea from Charles Lyell was most important to Darwin's thinking?
2
Why was Lamarck's mechanism of evolution rejected?
3
A piece of charcoal from an ancient campfire contains 25% of its original carbon-14. The half-life of carbon-14 is 5730 years. How old is the charcoal, in years?
years
4
A volcanic rock contains 12.5% of its original amount of a radioactive isotope whose half-life is 1.3 billion years. How old is the rock, in billions of years? Give one decimal place.
billion years
5
What is the term for structures in different species that have the same underlying bones and origin but may have different functions?
6
Which pair is an example of analogous structures?
7
Match each observation to the line of evidence for evolution it belongs to.
Tiktaalik has both fins and wrist-like bones
Galápagos species resemble South American species
Whales have small, reduced pelvic bones
Vertebrate embryos all have pharyngeal arches and a tail
Closely related species have more similar DNA sequences
8
Put these events in order from longest ago to most recent.
  1. 1Darwin publishes On the Origin of Species (1859)
  2. 2Archaeopteryx lives (about 150 million years ago)
  3. 3Tiktaalik lives (about 375 million years ago)
  4. 4Earth forms (about 4.6 billion years ago)
  5. 5Single-celled life appears in the fossil record
9
Blind cave fish have small eyes that no longer work. What term describes a structure like this, reduced from its function in ancestors?
10
Why is DNA comparison considered especially strong evidence for evolution?

Spot a mistake on this page? Let us know